One of the most important ships of this era in the
evolution of sailing ship design was the merchant ship. It was this
ship that carried the bulk of the merchandise upon which trade, business
and the development of the world depended.
These ships of necessity had to be armed to protect
themselves from pirates and the predatory activities of many nations,
among them the British, all of whom, considered it perfectly reasonable to
capture the merchant ships of other nations. In fact, it could be
argued that it was just this kind of activity that brought about the whole
"trade" of piracy on the high seas! Nations frequently
granted official permission to wealthy ship owners to cruise at large
searching for likely captures. Sir Francis Drake, John Frobisher,
Sir Walter Raleigh are famous names who practiced this kind of
freebooting. They were called "privateers" because they
were privately owned vessels acting on their own account - although they
were expected to render generous portions of their "prizes" to
the reigning monarch. Of course, many of these men were quite happy
to act without any authority, however, if their activity happened to cause
political embarrassment to the crown, then they were liable to be locked
up upon their return - unless, of course, they could come across with a
sufficient sum of money to purchase their freedom. Another word for
that, of course, would be a bribe!
As time passed, however, nations began to work out
agreements regarding this sort of thing and it ceased to be tolerated,
unless it was a time of war and then, of course, all bets were off and the
merchant shipping of enemy nations once again became fair game.
Naval captains and their crews (to a lesser extent) could become
fabulously wealthy from the sale of such captures. These were called
a "prize of war" and there were strict rules about how the prize
money was apportioned.
So, for these reasons merchant ships went armed and
could often be difficult to tell apart from full fledged naval vessels.
For further protection they often traveled in convoy and a fleet of well
armed merchant men was a formidable force and not one that any right
minded pirate would care to tamper with.
Speed and capacity were important too and so ship owners
employed all the latest developments in ship design as they evolved.
Hull shapes changed slowly, but they did evolve and the rig became more
advanced with subtle but definite changes in sail plan. By the end of the
18th century ships had become quite advanced with the disappearance of
those towering fore and stern castles and a longer, flatter line to
the
deck. There was still a break at the fore and poop deck, but
it was not the huge high tower of previously. There was still a
"tumblehome" in the rounded design of the hull and bulwarks -
the barrel-like shape of the hull you can see in earlier ships.
However, it was possible to discern the diminishing of this as the 19th
century advanced. The trim lean lines of the frigate began to be
seen more and more in the navies of the world, the first one of this type
being built in 1646. Her dimensions were approximately as follows:
length (approximately) 100ft., beam 26ft., depth 13 ft. She had an
armament of 32 to 44 guns and a crew compliment of about 130 men.
The USS Constitution was the largest example built at the time of her
launching in 1797 and carried 44 guns. She would have arguably been
one of the most powerful ships afloat in her class. Of course, she
was built by the fledgling US government as a warship for her emerging
navy. However, she is a good example of this emerging new
shape in sailing ship design. In her case her dimensions were: 111
meters overall (only 8 meters shorter than HMS Victory which was a First
Rate Ship of the Line and carried 104 guns and was launched in 1765) and
is 16 meters in her beam and has a draught of 7 meters. Constitution
displaces 2,235 tons and was capable of doing 13.5 knots. She
carried standing royals on all three masts. Originally she had a
figurehead representing Hercules carrying a raised club. She is
fondly called "Old Ironsides" and is still in commission
preserved at Charleston, near Boston and is occasionally sailed on special
occasions. You can visit her home on the web at: http://www.ussconstitution.navy.mil/
or from my links
page.
These craft were ship rigged which means they were three-masted with each
mast fully rigged. A fully rigged mast consisted of a driver, the largest
sail at the bottom, one or two topsails, and one or two gallants with
sometimes a royal and even a skysail above that. From the mid to late 19th
Centuries the topsails and gallants began to be split in two for ease of
handling as sail sizes increased - hence lower and upper topsails or
gallants.
The deck line of the frigates became straighter and flatter as they
evolved. The US Constitution illustrates the type perfectly.
A British East Indiaman of
the late 18th Century and early 19th.
The British East India
Companies Warren Hastings which was captured by the French frigate
Piemontaise in 1805 and towed away as a prize capture.
The British East India Company was formed by Royal
Charter in 1600 and lasted until 1834, when the charter was rescinded.
In 1808, when the company was at its peak, it was operating fifty four
ships (totaling more than 45,000 tons) between London, India and China.
These East Indiamen - as they were called - left England carrying cargoes
of household goods, wines and watches: they returned laden with spices,
sugar, ivory and more often than not opium. The officers of this
fleet were said to be the elite of the shipping world.
For both the Dutch and the British East India Company it
is fair to say that they ruled their worlds - and held influence that
often far exceeded that of their respective governments. Both
maintained fully fledged armies that were, in some cases, more effective
than anything their governments could rely upon in the remote outposts in
which they held sway. The British influence in India increased in
power due almost entirely to the presence of this quasi-military force
that in uniform and structure was almost identical to the British army
itself. In books and stories you will often find these two
organisations, which existed for one reason only, to make money out of
their trading ventures for their shareholders back home, as the
"honorable" companies - thus, The Honorable British East India
Company.
Of course, there were other smaller types of trading and
merchant vessels employed from time to time, for different purposes and
reasons. For example, the slave ships were usually fast schooners of
two, and occasionally three, masts. These were fairly shallow
bottomed craft capable of sailing close in shore to avoid the various
naval ships that were, latterly at any rate, employed to discourage the
trade. These craft were mostly fore & aft rigged, though
sometimes they might have had a square top sail and even two on the fore
mast. As such, they are not of great interest as far as these pages
are concerned which are specifically focused on the evolution of
square-rig. Then, again, there were many smaller square-rigged ships
of two or three masts that carried various amounts and types of square
sails which I may look at later.